![]() ![]() ![]() You are not just talking about a blunt fact, but more about a tragedy that, with a bit of imagination, you might almost see happening before your eyes.ģ) Here, depuis deux jours dénudait les arbres is just the background for the action cesser. ![]() But the author chose the imparfait for the same reason that you might say: in -365, the temple that took the Greek 120 years of time and energy was being taken down by Érostrate, instead of in -365 Érostrate destroyed a temple. We could use passé composé and then plus-que-parfait. 5.2.5 : Present, Passe compose, Imparfait, Futur proche, Passe proche, Futur simple, Plus-que-parfait, Futur dans le. 2 facts, one being anterior to the other. Il (neiger) pendant une semaine avant mon arrivée. Quand je (aller) aux États-Unis, j (visiter) New York qui (être) couverte de neige. ![]() We need the passé composé for the most recent and the plus-que-parfait for the other one.Ģ) Here, this could be the same things. Mettez les verbes entre paranthèses aux temps qui conviennent (passé composé, imparfait ou plus-que-parfait) 1. Whereas the imparfait is for something that lasts in time and serves as a background for something else.ġ) This is the most regular of the sentences you provided. Something punctual, or at least the conclusion of something that lasted. Just to complete it a little:įirst of all, keep in mind that the passé composé is used for a fact. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |